Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PowerISO

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 03:24, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PowerISO

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of notability or third-party sourcing ViperSnake151 Talk 16:46, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:55, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the only third-party sources are software download sites, which do not establish notability sovereign°sentinel 05:09, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment At least this software's image format (.daa, Direct Access Archive) used to be quite (in)famous, if only because it could not be opened in any other application (while quite popular to "share" disc images due to its compression features). This would make it rather likely the software itself is notable as well. —Ruud 10:21, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Regardless of whether they are notable, the current page is made up entirely of primary sources. Removing the poor sourcing means effectively deleting the article. CorporateM (Talk) 07:37, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.