Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quadrigram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 12:21, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quadrigram

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. I've done some searches, and it appears there is nothing significantly showing notability here. The article's main purpose appears to, once again, be advertising. --Mdann52talk to me! 08:24, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, or resolve its problems. It has virtually no source other than company's website, let alone evidence of notability which must be in the form of reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. But in the past, some of my colleagues on Wikipedia have proven to be far better than me in finding evidences of notability for online source. If this came to pass, I have no prejudice against this alternative. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 08:37, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No WP:RS and not even a claim of WP:Notability.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 12:56, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't see how are articles like Quadrigram are tolerated. Every statement is arbitrarily made, No notability claims, No refs, Not even primary refs! Although I have personally improved the article's content and it would be a shame to have it deleted, rules are rules. -- Wonderfl ^(reply) 13:18, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:10, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:10, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.