Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raj K.Modi
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The article's subject is found to lack notability. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 17:39, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Raj K.Modi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm doubtful that this individual meets WP:N, but the article creator objected to a prod and added references. superβεεcat 18:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC) Note: Obvious WP:COI with author based on actions/responses/history. - superβεεcat 22:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Human3015 It will rain 19:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Human3015 It will rain 19:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete likely as there is some coverage but unlikely solid enough for a noticeably better article. SwisterTwister talk 21:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete owning a company does not make someone inherently notable. Curro2 (talk) 23:50, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show they meet notability criteria. Onel5969 TT me 13:33, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.