Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rashmi Ranjan Parida

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Article was eligible for speedy deletion per G5. MER-C 03:33, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rashmi Ranjan Parida (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of article does not possess in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources hence falls short of WP:GNG Subject is a journalist that fails WP:JOURNALIST as the subject hasn’t created any notable work/project. Furthermore he also does not pass WP:ANYBIO, Finally the reference-bombing observed in the article might be a front/camouflage intended to confuse the untrained eye. Celestina007 (talk) 17:33, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:33, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:33, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:33, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:33, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - article is based on PR announcements and syndicated, promotional news. Not a single truely independent source with in-depth coverage about this person. At best he is a locally-known personality, but not a "notable" topic per our standards. The article is part of a COI-created series of topics around the founder and his festivals - in fact it could probably be speedied. Note: I have also asked for an SPI as background check. GermanJoe (talk) 18:01, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
GermanJoe Brilliant job!! | Celestina007 (talk) 12:08, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.