Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real Matters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:31, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Real Matters

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

references are mere notices. "Fastest growing" has a tendency to mean "not yet notable" DGG ( talk ) 01:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - due to the generic name of the business, searching for sources is a bit difficult. However, I found several [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. While none of these sources is a slam dunk piece of evidence, collectively I feel they convey sufficient notability to have an article. It is probably true that "fastest growing" meant "not yet notable" when it was first awarded in 2010, but 5 years later notability has now been established. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:47, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I appreciate there are sources but a fundamental problem is there is no real explanation to what the company is or what it does to a man in the street, which is a frequent problem with non-notable companies. The company's website : "Real Matters creates powerful insights into residential and commercial properties. Leveraging its cloud-based technology platform, redihive" is full of buzzword bingo which doesn't help. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:05, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam ^Sing! 07:13, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:02, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.