Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Restaurantware

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 15:18, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restaurantware

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. Very little independent coverage, and most of it is from other organisations in the industry. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP Joseph2302 (talk) 13:51, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:04, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:04, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Source searches are not providing independent significant coverage in reliable sources. Lots of primary source press releases out there, but does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:08, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. After doing some serious editing, I am persuaded that this company is Notable. You can't buy editorial space in Inc., and HuffPo has seen fit to give some column space to the firm's co-founder. Kitchn is a product of the http://www.apartmenttherapy.com/team. Sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 04:24, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Huffington Post does have many non-paid contributors and bloggersAusLondonder (talk) 06:36, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - whilst the company has received some mentions in sources, the sources are not specifically about this company. It does not seem to pass the test as notable. AusLondonder (talk) 06:36, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.