Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. Lane Dossett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wifione ^Message 10:04, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

R. Lane Dossett[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just realized I failed to give a reason! Yes, notability and resume, advert, etc. Sorry :) SarahStierch (talk) 05:19, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Has been a lawyer for three years. Article is a resume. Nothing in searches to be found or makes him stand out. Bgwhite (talk) 06:25, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 09:46, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete falls way short of what is needed for a bio of a living person in terms of sourcing. i kan reed (talk) 19:25, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.