Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhodie bar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rhodie. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:23, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rhodie bar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable establishments that only have passing mentions in reliable sources. Rhodie covers anything about these establishments that appears to be notable. Looking through the various sources did not convince me this article is suitable for Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a WP:DATABASE for any and all establishments. Desertambition (talk) 07:04, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, South Africa, and Zimbabwe. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:04, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete or redirect to Rhodie. Hard to find any sources, and personally never heard of this. Park3r (talk) 05:02, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:45, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Rhodie, not finding the sort of coverage we would need for a stand-alone. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:34, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Information on the Rhodie article is sufficient enough. No need for a separate article. Iamawesomeautomatic (talk) 22:20, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.