Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sachin Gupta (academic)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Missvain (talk) 01:36, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sachin Gupta (academic)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Fails WP:GNG. DJRSD (talk) 06:36, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DJRSD (talk) 06:36, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. DJRSD (talk) 06:36, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. DJRSD (talk) 06:36, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article has all WP:RELIABLE sources to pass WP:BIO and the respective person is editor-in-chief for a prestigious Journal of Marketing Research, published by the American Marketing Association along with notable awards and publications. Applus2021 (talk) 08:05, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note This is the creator of the article. DJRSD (talk) 11:14, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:37, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Easy NACADEMIC pass, trivially passing NACADEMIC-5 by being a named chair in Cornell University. Fairly strong citation record and being editor in chief of Journal of Marketing Research also possibly tick NACADEMIC points 1 and 8.--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 16:23, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep because of a seriously erroneous nomination, one that does not even consider academic notability (which he clearly passes). —David Eppstein (talk) 16:38, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. NPROF is the relevant guideline, and he meets several of its criteria for notability. JoelleJay (talk) 16:50, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. Carwile2 ^*message* 19:09, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.