Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salva Marjan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Salva Marjan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet any notability guidelines, also full of wrong information. H4MCHTR (talk) 08:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep/drafty -- This riser is a female Formula 1 driver[1][2][3] and a female motivator.Women are rare in the more male dominated field of racing, specially in India.This is not a reason to retain an article, but as a motor sports delate she participated in a notable event 2023 F4 Indian Championship in his career and became a champion at the state level- Will this pass WP:NMOTORSPORT ? Or Or if it's a future pass then keep it as a draft and move it to main space if it comes to policy pass later.Owner of magical cat 🐈 (talk) 9:26, 08 January 2024 (UTC)
Participation in a single round of an F4 series is far from notable. There is no source for the state-level championship, and even if there were, that does not automatically qualify the driver for an article. Please revisit the page for the WP:NMOTORSPORT guideline you are referring to and take note that this driver is extremely far from qualifying for any of the guideline's points - now and in the foreseeable future. H4MCHTR (talk) 18:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Spworld2: She is not a Formula 1 driver; she is in Indian F4, which is several steps down the F1 ladder. Racing in F4 doesn't confer notability on a driver – please familiarise yourself with WP:NMOTORSPORT. There's nothing in the article that's worth preserving, it's extremely short and poorly redacted. On top of that her results don't suggest any sort of WP:POTENTIAL, so draftifying is futile. MSport1005 (talk) 20:44, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.