Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarfaroshi Ke Tamanna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:12, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sarfaroshi Ke Tamanna

Left untranslated at WP:PNT for three weeks. Here is the discussion:

The language of this article is not known to me. --71.28.250.126 19:27, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently some song lyrics in some language of India? Kusma (討論) 19:30, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Should probably be deleted. Grand master ka 05:22, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, it is being linked from List of patriotic songs. Someone should confirm if this song is really a patriotic song for India. Found this, which may appear to point so. -- ReyBrujo 05:32, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Would make for an article if it actually contained encyclopedic information about the song. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:14, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Googling for the first line results in this, which implies that it's the lyrics of a song from a Bollywood movie. If this is the case, it's probably a copyright violation, unless the song is in the public domain. Either way, the content doesn't belong on Wikipedia, and should perhaps belong on one of the Indian Wikisources. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 09:57, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not English. If a description of what it was and what it means and why it's important was included, fine, but it's not -- the tag at the end is nonsensical. Fnarf999 19:16, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Song lyrics with virtually no context don't constitute encyclopedia articles in any language. --Metropolitan90 20:11, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Jude. Buchanan-H e rmit™..SCREAM!!!.... 00:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, if nobody's translated by now it can't be all that important. Stifle (talk) 00:02, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.