Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semantic Web Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 00:25, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semantic Web Company

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a Notable company. No citations to Reliable sources. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 07:31, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete speedily. —Мандичка^YO 😜 07:48, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semantic Web Company (SWC) has been a leading provider of Semantic Web technologies since 2004. SWC has published at Springer the first books in this field for the German speaking community ever. See: https://www.semantic-web.at/springer/
SWC is actively participating within the Open Knowledge Foundation since many years, and has been a founding member of the Austrian Chapter, see also: http://okfn.at/experts-team/
SWC is actively developing and supporting Open Data Portals with many projects, e.g. https://www.opendataportal.at/ueber-odp/ or http://datahub.io/dataset/socialsemweb-thesaurus
SWC is actively supporting the DBpedia association, see: http://wiki.dbpedia.org/meetings/Leipzig2014
SWC has generated a significant footprint within the Drupal community and a variety of contributions to the Drupal Project, see: https://www.drupal.org/node/1983364 — Preceding unsigned comment added by ABLVienna (talk • contribs) 10:51, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
SWC's Martin Kaltenboeck is member of the Steering Commitee of the European Data Forum (http://data-forum.eu/committees), which is a significant community for Europe's Big Data industry and research, see for example Neelie Kroes and Martin Kaltenboeck talking at EDF 2014: http://2014.data-forum.eu/program — Preceding unsigned comment added by ABLVienna (talk • contribs) 10:44, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Its product PoolParty is used by various large global organizations like Worldbank, Council of the European Union, IAEA, Roche, Boehringer, Daimler, Credit Suisse, Wolters Kluwer, Pearson, British Medical Journals, Healtdirect Australia, The Pokemon Company, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, etc. see: http://www.poolparty.biz/some-of-our-clients/
KMWorld reports about SWC's ongoing progress with its products: http://www.kmworld.com/Articles/News/News/Knowledge-graph-management-and-text-analytics-from-Semantic-Web-Company-101697.aspx
Semantic Web Company is the main organizer of Europe's larges Semantic Web Conference, which takes place the 11th time this year, see: http://www.semantics.cc/ - last year the event attracted over 250 people in Leipzig/Germany.
Semantic Web Company is part of some of the most significant and largest Linked Data and Big Data projects in Europe. E.g. http://www.big-data-europe.eu/ or http://aligned-project.eu/ - which consists of a consortium with Trinity College Dublin, University of Oxford, University of Leipzig, etc.
Semantic Web Company and its product incl. open source components have generated a significant footprint and many references in scientific papers and publications. Here is a list of articles and papers referencing to PoolParty: http://www.poolparty.biz/papers-and-articles/

I leave it up to you if this is "notable" or not. --ABLVienna (talk) 12:24, 28 March 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by ABLVienna (talk • contribs) 10:18, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:24, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:24, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:24, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:24, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:39, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Most of these, as far as I can tell, were posted by SWC itself. Wikipedia needs third-party sources, because any company with sufficient capital can make a bunch of pages. Also, 250 people? That's not very many. Blah2 (talk) 14:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: All the sources are primary, so even if the org were notable, we would still have to delete everything in the article to remove primary sources, so we might as well delete the page. CorporateM (Talk) 05:43, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.