Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sithi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. Seems the best way to cover all the concerns mentioned here. If there is any content worth merging it can be pulled from the page history. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:56, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sithi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A page on a fictional race in Tad Williams' Memory, Sorrow, and Thorn series. WP:CRUFT, possibly with some WP:OR, and it fails WP:N. What makes the Sithi any more notable than any of the other species in the series? Also unreferenced since 2009. I just can't see this becoming useful or notable in any manner. Runch (talk) 18:06, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge In general, I agree with the nomination. An article is not appropriate. The Memory, Sorrow, and Thorn article is not long; a one or two sentence mention of the Sithi could be appropriate there in a brief description of the world Tad Williams has created. Plot should be reserved for the individual book articles. --Bejnar (talk) 20:37, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:52, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:52, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to the series in which they appear, as above, per WP:ATD. Jclemens (talk) 02:43, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- having read the article, I don't see any properly sourced content, or any content that is not in-universe plot summary or fan speculation. It may be that the Memory, Sorrow, and Thorn article would benefit from having this fictional race described there, but it is clear that nothing in this article would be helpful. Reyk _YO! 11:03, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Memory, Sorrow, and Thorn. I agree with Reyk that while information for this fictional element could be added to the main article, there is really nothing currently in this article worth being used to merge, as it is completely unsourced. Rather than a straight deletion, though, I think a redirect would be useful as a plausible search term. Rorshacma (talk) 17:57, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.