Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharptooth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jdcomix (talk) 21:06, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sharptooth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not believe this page meets the notability standards of WP:BAND Enwebb (talk) 19:14, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep ~~or redirect~~ - Band is covered in multiple, reliable sources. Additionally, there are several suitable redirects to which the term can be pointed. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:45, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - To be clear, I strongly prefer a vote for keep. However, if the article can not be kept, it should be redirected to Pure Noise Records. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:19, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 23:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 23:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 23:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep has coverage in reliable sources such as Alternative Press and Decibel Magazine so passes WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC Atlantic306 (talk) 18:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.