Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sutcliffe Jügend

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sutcliffe Jügend[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources. No reliable coverage available through a quick Google News search. AllMusic, as was argued in the last AfD, is by itself not enough to satisfy WP:MUSICBIO. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:18, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:18, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:18, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 11:48, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Probably not the sort of band that the NME or The Guardian are going to cover, but there's some coverage online, e.g. [1], [2], [3]. --Michig (talk) 12:55, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it Fails WP:GNG & WP:RS , Not enough significant coverege on WP:RS NO evidence of Notability Samat lib (talk) 00:38, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.