Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suresoft Technologies, Inc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 20:07, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suresoft Technologies, Inc

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

marginally notable, many WP:PRODUCT failing product pages created. probable PR/COI. Has a fewsources, but are in korean, so difficult to evaluate quality. opening it up to wider audience. Gaijin42 (talk) 02:01, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:44, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete No WP:Notable significance within the software testing industry. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:52, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
More inclined to delete and draft/userfy (if wished) as although I'm not a Korean speaker, my searches found nothing to convince there's a better shot at improvement and notability here, here, here and here. SwisterTwister talk 21:59, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.