Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strike Fighters 2: Vietnam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Third Wire. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:43, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strike Fighters 2: Vietnam

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2009 with no attempts at improvement. WP:BEFORE turned up database entries, postings of the manual online, and forum posts. The only possible WP:SIGCOV I could find was this, from a Russian video game magazine. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 15:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Military. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 15:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Third Wire as an alternative to deletion. Not seeing anything. Timur9008 (talk) 20:00, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Third Wire per others, as well as redirecting Strike Fighters 2, which is equally non-notable. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:33, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:04, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Third Wire. No identified reliable secondary sources to establish notability here. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 07:48, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.