Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Satanic Scriptures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Peter H. Gilmore. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-18 09:35Z

The Satanic Scriptures

Does not meet notability standards in WP:BK Craigtalbert 22:29, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to article on author: Close call. It will almost certainly become notable, but that is certainly not reason to keep. However, we have a review here. For now, I think all the information should be kept in the article on the author, and it can be moved out if and when this becomes notable in its own right. J Milburn 22:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to article on author or keep: While I believe, personally, that deleting the article is counter-productive, my sources for its notability pre-release are not up to Wikipedia's standards. Give it its own article at a later date. However, it should be noted that many of Anton LaVey's books' articles have less info than even this article, yet have their own. This is excusable because of his historical influence, and in my opinion should be the same here, but it's a very close call. Darkahn 23:13, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or Keep per above. As I said on the talk page, with reliable sources citing anticipation of the book, it'd be a definite keep. Jeodesic 23:49, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to article on author per J Milburn's recommendation. -- Craigtalbert 01:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.