Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Toluenes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 07:01, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Toluenes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Regionable band of questionable notability, possibly autobiographical/self-promotional. No real sourcing originally, although another editor has since added two regional news articles. No recent significant coverage in independent third-party publications. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 15:01, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 19:33, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – With significant coverage in multiple reliable sources—the Charleston Daily Mail, The Herald-Dispatch, and The Independent were the ones I added—the subject meets WP:BAND criterion #1. I don't understand the nominator's concern about whether or not the coverage is "recent". Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:56, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The text does have some promotional overtones that could be ameliorated, but there's sufficient evidence of notability. --Arxiloxos (talk) 03:16, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.