Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wrecks (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 22:27, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Wrecks[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article on The Wrecks was deleted in November 2017. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wrecks. What has happened recently is that the band released its first album, Infinitely Ordinary. Nothing in the article implies that the band or the album satisfies any of the musical notability criteria. The first reference states that the band exists. We knew that. The second reference states that the album exists. We knew that. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:17, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:17, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:17, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:17, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete I found three pieces on Billboard's website, but I'm not convinced they're enough to satisfy GNG. There's a short bio at AllMusic and only one of their works is listed there, and it has no review or rating. When doing a Google search, there is nothing else present on the first five pages. As I was cleaning the article up I was thinking delete and salt, but not sure if salting is needed. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:31, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. This is a tricky one. There's lots of coverage out there, but when the reprinted press releases, fansites masquerading as magazines, student newspapers, event announcements, and brief mentions are stripped out, there isn't much left. The best I found that haven't already been identified are: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. --Michig (talk) 10:03, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the Billboard piece referenced in the article is significant coverage in a reliable source together with coverage in AllMusic and Altpress and others identified above for a pass of WP:GNG and criteria 1 of WP:NMUSIC, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:45, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost (talk) 10:28, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Hopefully consensus can be reached in the next week.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:24, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This article needs some improvements but with the Billboard pieces and other sources found this article meets WP:BAND. JayJay^{What did I do?} 05:09, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - whilst there are a lot of junk sources in the article, as others have mentioned, the Billboard one, along with a few others, is enough Spiderone 11:34, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.