Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TrustedPeer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:24, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TrustedPeer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Cited sources are a press release by a business partner (Cal Poly), the company's own website, and a Fortune article that contains only passing mention of the company. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:04, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:44, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:44, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:44, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete -ADVERTISEMENT. Fails WP:NCORP. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 00:57, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORP. The article isn't even clear about what the company does: it describes it as a software company but it sounds more like a consultant firm. Lacks significant coverage; the Fortune article contains only a mention so passing that I had to read the article twice to find it. --MelanieN (talk) 20:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:00, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.