Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TraceMyIP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 22:56, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TraceMyIP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Going through the sources, most are press releases. One is a patent (primary source), and one is an Alexa ranking. Only one ref provided any independent coverage, and that is effectively a directory listing. - Bilby (talk) 22:48, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable. I concur with the nominator's assessment. In fact, those press releases are actually all the same one just repeated by different publishers. There are no truly independent sources (as per WP:RS) with anything remotely in-depth in the article, and I can't find any myself. Squinge (talk) 10:26, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm in agreement with Bilby and Squinge. There is no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject here nor can I find any. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:55, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.