Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tulsa Youth Symphony

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:22, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tulsa Youth Symphony

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

youth symphonies are not normally notable. This one is no different; essentially all the sources are press releases. DGG ( talk ) 06:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 12:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - well established orchestra; it received some coverage for its 50th anniversary. It seems strange to say "youth symphonies are not normally notable" when Category:American youth orchestras has 68 articles. St Anselm (talk) 11:10, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this orchestra is notable for it's continuity, and alumni, note - there are many wiki entries on other Youth Symphonies around the US (over 50), even a wiki on Youth Orchestras in the US. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.177.124.156 (talk) 23:48, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 22:10, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.