Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uberbyte
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 11:22, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Uberbyte[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Uberbyte (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to fail WP:MUSICBIO. I can't find any significant coverage other than this album review. The article has been unsourced (other than to the band's website) and tagged for notability since its creation in 2012. Lennart97 (talk) 11:51, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 11:51, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 11:51, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. starship.paint (exalt) 11:59, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Having just spent some quality time on Google, I have enjoyed their music but become convinced they fail WP:BAND. Shame, they're quite fun... Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:56, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. Current sources don't demonstrate notability. Grandruskiy48 (talk) 16:50, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: No significant Coverage found and not pass general notability guidelines. TheDreamBoat (talk) 06:47, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.