Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Duffield

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 09:49, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria Duffield

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod declined with an edit summary of "lame excuse". Absolutely no sources existing or found. Fails WP:BIO. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 02:44, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and Comment: Provides great detail on Duffield. Also, I added some external links to the page. 207.216.29.12 (talk) 00:59, 20 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.216.29.12 (talk) 00:49, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~: Victoria Duffield's Wikipedia page has detailed information about her personal life, music and her journey in The Next Star. It also includes films and tv series she's been in. 207.216.29.12 (talk) 00:59, 20 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.216.29.12 (talk) 00:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~: Her page has a lot of information about not only her part in The Next Star, but also the different TV series she's been in and TV movies. It now has many different sections including, Personal life, The Next Star, Music and Filmography. It also includes references to articles and a link to her official website. The Victoria Duffield page should not be deleted. 207.216.29.12 (talk) 00:59, 20 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.216.29.12 (talk) 00:29, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The original prod rationale of "No sources, WP:GNG fail" was actually pretty accurate, and not lame at all. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 11:11, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: 15 year old girls gyrating like this[1] to pseudo hip-hop is horrible. Apparently she made the top 6 of Season 3 of the Canadian talent show "The Next Star". I added some cites to the article, but its local press and really not a lot. Ideally, we could redirect to The Next Star and move over a sentence or two of content with it (and the refs), and do the same for Mimoza Duot (currently PRODed) if refs exist.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 20:17, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It has enough info. ----iSquishy (talk) 23:28, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 2 gnews hits [2]. current article includes 2 very localised news sources. LibStar (talk) 06:23, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per above, fails the GNG and WP:ENTERTAINER going away. Let us know if you ever get a second 15 minutes, Victoria. Ravenswing 14:13, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, she's performing at the Clayburn Gourmet Gallery in Abbotsford on November 19, book your travel now!!--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 14:45, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, she's doing better than Brianna Rieffel, anyway ... Ravenswing 15:43, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to The Next Star#Season 3. Fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Location (talk) 02:25, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.