Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WatanNetwork

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G11: the following quote is sufficient evidence "The company was built to help content owner and content creator to protect and monetize there content in easy professional way with our team help. " That was in the first version and all subsequent revisions. The rest of the article is designed to support that purpose. DGG ( talk ) 23:52, 20 March 2015 (UTC) DGG ( talk ) 23:52, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WatanNetwork

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Weakly sourced (e.g., YouTubes, blog, WP itself) promotional article fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Logical Cowboy (talk) 12:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.