Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Levitan
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:51, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- William Levitan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not seeing independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources, either those in the article or elsewhere online - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Likely fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC. The American Academy in Rome hands out 30 Rome Prizes annually and it is simply "a study fellowship at the academy", so not a notable award. Edwardx (talk) 10:13, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Academics and educators. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:35, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Inadequate sourcing to meet notability for WP: GNG as well as WP:BIO. The coverage in this field is standard and the award isn’t significant enough on its own. NiklausGerard (talk) 23:25, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.