Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xorkaelians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 04:37, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Xorkaelians

Non-notable neogolism. Scant information on the source history, context or external references are known at present. Reads like a WP:POV fork from Star Trek. --Gavin Collins 15:06, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 15:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, preferably into a new article on civilizations in the Star Fleet Universe. Once again, this has nothing to do with POV... there's no point of view being advanced here, or in the other articles where you've cited it as a reason for deletion. Nor is this a neologism; it's the proper noun created to describe a fictional concept. Please pay attention to what policies actually mean before citing them as the basis for nominating an article for deletion. Pinball22 17:08, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 40 Google hits, I checked six non-Wikipedia, and five were mirrors of Wikipedia. I doubt I'd find any references in a university library either, so that's all I can go on. No secondary sources, no notability. MarkBul 18:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete - Fancruft, WP:POV, and very badly written with it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pete Fenelon (talk • contribs) 00:57, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, though it appears that it your opinion that any page involving a gaming/rpg subject is not to be included in Wikipedia. --Donovan Ravenhull 02:51, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - that's right, I think anything 'in game' belongs on fansites. Descriptions of the game itself are fine on wikipedia IMHO, but fancruft belongs on fan sites. Pete Fenelon 10:57, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please read Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Fancruft_and_Role_playing_games before commenting on this AfD - Fosnez 14:39, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without significant real world information, this level of fictional detail is not justified. -- Ned Scott 06:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: What detail? NN, no available verifiable sources, etc. There are dozens of species that have much more data available that aren't covered separately from the parent series. That said, might be a candidate for a merge to List of Star Trek races if they're not stripping out non-canon races. MrZaius^talk 09:42, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.