Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Papagan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 19:44, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Papagan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While cleaning up the list of candidates at 2021 California gubernatorial recall election I stumbled across this article. He doesn't seem to meet any of the requirements of WP:NMUSIC or WP:NPOL, and though there is some coverage in reliable sources it's quite superficial. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 20:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 20:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 20:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting case. I would lean towards inclusion, mainly because of this, but with the sourcing I found he's not clearly notable. Hopefully someone else can dig up something more substantive, because I think given his various involvements, it does make sense to have an article here (a weakness of the notability policy, really). Elli (talk | contribs) 07:42, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Coverage mainly about his work and projects. I think perhaps The O.J. Simpson Museum might merit its own article though. Missvain (talk) 00:53, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ambrosiawater (talk) 16:35, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Curator of a museum is often enough to demonstrate notability but curator of a "pop-up museum"? I'm not convinced. From reading the article Elli linked, I would describe it more accurately as a one-man gallery showing, analogous to WP:NARTIST. Having one covered gallery showing does not yet raise to the level of significant coverage. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:02, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.4meter4 (talk) 20:01, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.