Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ado Gegaj (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:57, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ado Gegaj[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO or WP:MUSICBIO / WP:COMPOSER. Sources in article and WP:BEFORE revealed no WP:IS WP:RS containing material that meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. Some routine mill coverage exists and mentions in other articles that fall under WP:NOTINHERITED. BLP articles should strictly follow WP:RS, WP:V and WP:N sourcing requirements.

This is the thrid time this article has been created and AfD'd, Deletion log; suggest SALT? // Timothy :: talk 21:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 21:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bibliographies-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 21:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 21:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Salting seems wise too. Zacwill (talk) 07:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non notable musician -Xclusivzik (talk) 13:03, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article looks like a self-written autobiography for promotional purposes. It's nice that he's married with kids, but so are lots of people. As for his music, despite a lengthy career and many releases, he is only present in the typical streaming and database services. Unless his name has alternate spellings, he has achieved no reliable media coverage under the name shown here. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 17:12, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt per nom Spiderone 12:05, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.