Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. J. Goldmann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE per discussion below. Sources don't seem to have been provided to demonstrate notability. -GTBacchus^(talk) 23:33, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A. J. Goldmann

Autobiography of non notable author (per WP:BIO). Journalist who has not been the subject of articles, reviews, ... Page was deleted after a prod (under a different spelling), then recreated, so taken to AfD as a contested prod. Fram 09:32, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable, not a reason to vote for delete also, but that is a very malformed page and I am out in 10 mins so unable to even try to help it a little. Dureo 12:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Previous irrelevant information stripped away. Valid entry on a valid journalist. Would not vote for deletion. Agree, might need some clean-up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.185.107.205 (talk) 09:32, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NN - Fails WP:BIO for Creative Professionals. --Sc straker 03:25, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable. Niaz^{(Talk •}^Contribs) 09:16, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- keep- I'm not saying he is notable, but has anyone here really made an effort to find out if he is? If no proof one way or the other, and he's a real journalist, I propose keep until evidence is presented one way or the other, and anyway the links show this guy is clearly real.JJJ999 13:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - You can't provide evidence that someone is not notable, so what you ask for is impossible. I have searched and I have not found any evidence that he is notable, but of course I haven't looked in every possible source. No one disputes that he is real, but the burden of evidence is on those wanting to keep an article, as it is possible to give evidence of notability, but you can't prove non notability (there doesn't exist a "who isn't" to accompany the "who's who"). Fram 18:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.