Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aircharter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Kinu ^t/_c 18:26, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aircharter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was written by User:Adamecho, who is either an employee or owner of this 46-employee company. Please delete because it fails WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. (I suspect it also fails WP:AUD.) —Unforgettableid (talk) 01:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (notify) @ 21:05, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹ 21:44, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's got a generic name, so it's not exactly easy to locate sources. However, "aircharter" "john harrison" gets extremely few hits on Google and nothing on Google News. The article seems to be made of non-independent primary sources and a few questionable ones that don't even mention the phrase "aircharter.com" anywhere. Given that the article was created by an employee (diff), I'm going to say that we should wait until better evidence of notability is presented. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:26, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm inclined to agree. If anything, the selected references indicate that the predecessor FlightTime may have been notable; their inclusion implies an attempt to make AirCharter.com seem notable by inheritance, but WP:NOTINHERITED. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:53, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.