Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Al-Rimawi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seddon ^talk 21:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed Al-Rimawi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hello all ... Regarding the article, the talent for simple drawing is not noticeable enough to have an article on Wikipedia, and also the references listed are unreliable local and news references, and the person has not achieved any achievement in the field of drawing, and he only draws people in the street, and who has this talent many From people, and the prizes he got are not great prizes, he only got an award from his school! The article does not meet the CV criteria. The article was previously deleted on the Arabic and French Wikipedia. --Osps7 (talk) 12:52, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ADMIN NOTE: This AFD was incorrectly created and I happened to be following up on the page and spotted the malformed AFD. I've rebuilt the afd correctly so everyone can find it, but because of the malformed original post my time stamp should be used as the correct start time for the AFD in this case. TomStar81 (Talk) 20:05, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Osps7 (talk) 12:52, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Was tagged as CSD A7, which I agreed with on principle. Lets use that as the basis for the AFD. TomStar81 (Talk) 20:10, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:47, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Jordan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:47, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't think that we have a policy on the use of soft news or junk food news to establish notability, but when using news sources for encyclopedia articles, we ought to consider if the source is providing some sort of analysis, criticism or reporting or merely entertainment. In the latter case, we notability has not been established, even if the source is the BBC or Al Jazeera. Vexations (talk) 21:24, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. Nitesh003 (TALK) 03:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:54, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.