Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Frontiers: A Public Lands Journey
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (and yes I did notice that one editor !voted "keep" twice) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- American Frontiers: A Public Lands Journey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable book/project Orange Mike | Talk 00:30, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep:Per [1], [2], [3], [4], [5],[6], and [7]. Joe Chill (talk) 00:43, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The project is both notable and educational. There are very few articles concerning public lands on Wikipedia. I will continue to edit tone. Publiclands (talk) 20:51, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This educational project pioneered an border-to-border route for pretty pure purposes, and should be included, as a matter of historical note. I am not sure how it constitutes advertisement at all, since it happened 8 years ago [8] [9][10].68.35.186.175 (talk) 04:05, 1 October 2010 (UTC)68.35.186.175 (talk) 04:15, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Queenellen[reply]
- Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for {{rescue}} by the Article Rescue Squadron. SnottyWong chatter 04:50, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Please take a few seconds to check the Google news and Google book searches BEFORE you nominate something. Plenty of notable news sources mention this, and the first result in a Google Book search shows American Motorcyclist magazine did an article about it. Dream Focus 05:41, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I have added more Wikipedia References, as well as external links. Again, this article is perfectly notable and should be kept. I will continue to make improvements. Publiclands (talk) 17:10, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Worthy and highly noteable not for profit awareness raising project. FeydHuxtable (talk) 18:55, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.