Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alix Aymé

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:04, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alix Aymé

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person does not appear to be a notable artist based upon browsing of web and books--CaroleHenson (talk) 17:15, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what makes Alix Aymé notable (See WP:Notability). What was it about her life or work was significant?

Were some of her personal or professional activities in Indochina notable?
Was there something about her work that was notable (unique style, technique, or something else)?
Did she inspire artists who then became successful?--CaroleHenson (talk) 17:21, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More information: I see that there was information posted to the article that an exhibition of her work was held this year at John Hopkins University. That seems to be helpful information!--CaroleHenson (talk) 22:31, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Update: The following bits of information have been added to the article. I'm not sure if it means she's notable, but it's a bit step forward:

Large frescos of hers are at the Royal Palace, Luang Prabang
Helped to bring back lacquer painting in Vietname
An exhibition of her work was held at John Hopkins University in 2012--CaroleHenson (talk) 13:49, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:48, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. No reason to be deleting such articles. Useful reference material here. Charles Matthews (talk) 21:20, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 14:20, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Based on the John Hopkins exhibit and her work at the Palace now it the article, I agree.--CaroleHenson (talk) 18:46, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, for what it's worth. Notability seems to be established by the material Carole has mentioned. --dragfyre_ʞןɐʇc 13:22, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to go ahead and remove the delete nomination template. It doesn't seem like there's any opposition now.--CaroleHenson (talk) 16:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.