Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Lowey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 15:28, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Lowey

I'm not convinced that the award he has received is sufficiently important to be noteworthy - just about every research area has awards somewhere or other, so winning an award that possibly nobody outside the industry will have heard of isn't a conclusive claim to notability to me. Searching "Pharmaceutical Care Awards" only gets 200 odd hits, which suggests to me the winners aren't exactly gaining wider fame. Average Earthman 18:03, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Isn't there a rule "Wikipedia is not for employee-of-the-month"? Maybe there should be. Not-notable. Bucketsofg 19:33, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete This could probably have gone on WP:PROD -- pm_shef 20:08, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm aware of WP:PROD, but didn't feel this was sufficiently clear for that - while I don't feel the award he has won is particularly notable, he has genuinely won it for his professional work. Average Earthman 13:26, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Now running a professionally recognized clinical program in diabetes control may not stand alongside the notable achievements of Air Force Amy, but I think there's a pretty good case for taking note of it. [1] Monicasdude 21:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I avoid discussions of porn stars on the grounds that I'm a complete prude who'd like to delete them all. Average Earthman 13:26, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete not notable. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 21:14, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. While I agree with Monicasdude that I would probably rather polish test tubes with Amy down at the ranch, Mr. Lowey did win that award as shown by that picture. -- JJay 21:29, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per Buckets. Wickethewok 09:22, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but Monicasdude's porn star analogy is erroneous: just because we have too many porn stars doesn't mean we should have too much of everything. Mangojuice 19:04, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, although this article does need a lot more research than what is available on the web. What limited research I could find I've added, and also emailed the hospital to see if I can get more. I'm a bit new to the wiki process, so forgive me if I'm clueless. Has anyone contacted the author of this article to ask him for more info?-Freedomelf 19:12, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just a note - as far as I'm concerned, it doesn't matter one jot how huge his employers are, notability is not a trickle down effect. The only thing that matters is whether the award he has won (as part of a group) is a genuinely notable one, or just one of a multitude of similar awards. Average Earthman 19:36, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.