Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association of Occupational Therapy Students

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:56, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Association of Occupational Therapy Students

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable student group in India. No clear claim to notability, sole source is the group's blog. Prod declined with no real improvement. Hairhorn (talk) 05:01, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this non-notable organization. Drmies (talk) 05:17, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete nothing in gnews [1]. LibStar (talk) 05:33, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i would like say something... i have linked the article with a web page called Occupational Therapy Health Mela which was solely the work Of Association of Occupational Therapy students. and about non notable group, let me tell you, its an registered Organization under Under SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT OF xxi, 1860 [ Regd. No.: s/63349/2008] tell me anything else to prove its originality. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amitkochhar (talk • contribs) 18:09, 7 September 2010 (UTC) — Amitkochhar (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

No one doubts that the club exists. The question is whether it is notable--please see WP:N. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:57, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The association clearly exists and does good work, but it is not "notable" in the Wikipedia sense. That is, other independent sources have not written about it or taken note of it. Only self-referential sources found. --MelanieN (talk) 16:43, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.