Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby Puss (The Flintstones)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. with hatnote added to the film article. JohnCD (talk) 16:38, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Baby Puss (The Flintstones)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Two references within article point to a list of characters and a two-paragraph notation on WordPress, with the other references providing details about real-world dinosaur extinction and saber-toothed cats.

Google search provides no links within the first 20 results that meet WP:GNG, instead providing links to fan wikis, message boards and eBay auctions.

The cat is mentioned in the theme song to The Flintstones, but only appears as a background character in three episodes of the entire series, and is not a regular plot element/character within the show. AldezD (talk) 18:19, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep-the cat defiantly is memorable in the song and the show, even if barley used.-I still would keep it though. Wgolf (talk) 22:49, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:52, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The character is not notable. Being memorable is not a criterion in the GNG. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:16, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but put hatnote over the film of the same name that leads to The Flinstones characters section where Baby Puss's character is covered. Fails notability requirements, but so long as the character gets covered we might as well have the hatnote. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:01, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- "Baby Puss (The Flintstones)" is not a very likely search term. A hatnote on the film (which would be moved over the disambiguation page) is enough. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:13, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that sounds like a good outcome so I'll change my vote accordingly.Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:30, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.