Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BankBazaar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure). The well-informed consensus is that BankBazaar has received significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, passing the general notability standard. An NPOV cleanup is recommended. There being no !votes in favor of deletion, save for the nom, I think this is safe for a NAC. North of Eden (talk) 01:18, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BankBazaar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The entire sourcing is routine funding announcements. There is nothing notable about the subject; fails WP:CORP. Article history suggests undisclosed paid placement on Wikipedia. Brianhe (talk) 16:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've been able to find some sources. The Amazon connection (Amazon owns maybe 5% of them) made it into the Times of India, the Economic Times, and TechCrunch. They're being profiled as a startup on the way up. They probably pass WP:CORP. The promotional material in the article needs some trimming, though. That's the main COI problem. John Nagle (talk) 19:29, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:02, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:02, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep standard searches reveal enough significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Some examples[1] [2] [3] [4]. Article needs a NPOV cleanup, especially the lede. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 07:59, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.