Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Brother 2007 (UK)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep due to sourcing. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:34, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article has less information in it than Big Brother Australia 2007 had when I nominated it for deletion, nothing is referenced, and there's still a season of the show that is currently airing on television. It's pretty much "crystalballism" at this point. J Di 09:40, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 12:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral Well, we know that the show is going to happen. I bet it gets recreated... The JPStalk to me 12:34, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless someone cares to add anything to it. And yes, it will get recreated. --Majorly (talk) 13:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It will obviously be recreated but I don't think it should happen until about two weeks before the show starts. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 13:25, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Last year's was created on 20 January [1]. As soon as info is available, it should be created, and if there is now it should be added. --Majorly (talk) 13:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair enough. I was just thinking not that much information can be known that far in advance but I guess I'm wrong. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 13:57, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Last year's was created on 20 January [1]. As soon as info is available, it should be created, and if there is now it should be added. --Majorly (talk) 13:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It will obviously be recreated but I don't think it should happen until about two weeks before the show starts. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 13:25, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - there's already information available about BB8 regarding audition locations and the "digital" housemate. Audition locations are announced in other articles, so I don't see why they can't be noted in this one. Torontois 02:26, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep FireSpike 19:54, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? This isn't a vote. --Majorly (talk) 19:57, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh yeah. I agree with Torontois. FireSpike 21:29, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as by what Torontois said.--HisSpaceResearch 21:09, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There is hardly no information regarding Big Brother 8 yet. 2 Lines for an article is not worth a page right now. Maybe in 4-6 weeks but not right now. In January 2006 MORE information about BB7 was released than it is now for BB8. All we know is Big Brother 8 will be very different, it is the last year at the current locations and the Audition Dates. Doesn't seem alot, and doesn't seem worth it. Until a larger portion of information is accurate I suggest just placing this information to the main BBUK article. — Coreix (talk) 17:19, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Saves hassle of creating a new article later when there is one available to add information to as it become available Jezabelda 00:25, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - it is now referenced. -Patstuarttalk|edits 02:17, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.