Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhardwaj
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 15:37, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Bhardwaj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't seem to find any reliable sources covering this as a group, clan or surname Ironholds (talk) 03:51, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Even if it did have realiable sources it would have to be totally redone JayJayTalk to me 03:53, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I found no coverage. SL93 (talk) 22:14, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per the above - there's no sourcing, and I can find no evidence elsewhere to show this as a notable subgroup. That said, should the title be redirected anywhere? UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 14:50, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless reliable sources can be found. --regentspark (comment) 17:03, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no reliable sources.Pernoctator (talk) 08:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Most of the content in this article is copied from Bharadwaja and Saraswat Brahmin. Anbu121 (talk me) 06:30, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.