Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blonde of Saint-Tropez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 22:53, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blonde of Saint-Tropez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is simply an advert for a locally-available beer. Links are to the tourism board and the company that produces the beer. Prof. Mc (talk) 15:37, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:15, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:15, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete Article's made by a single purpose account, probably self promotion. CerealKillerYum (talk) 19:03, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete: a couple of local news stories here and here, a bit of a novelty given that it is unusual for a municipality to license its name to, and receive royalties from, a brand of beer...but no national news org has picked up the story. Deleted from fr.wikipedia for failing their "critères d'admissibilité". Vrac (talk) 13:22, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮JAaron95 ^Talk 13:37, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So far, delete, delete, weak delete. Not a whole lot of discussion, but no real dissent. Prof. Mc (talk) 03:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (draft & userfy if needed) as my searches found nothing good at all aside from that Hollywood Reporter link. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - some local notoriety, but not enough coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:26, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.