Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CBN Act

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator - Speedy Keep. Natg 19 (talk) 08:05, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CBN Act[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge and delete. Unless someone can expand this article with more information about the CBN Act. Natg 19 (talk) 17:43, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator per comments below. Natg 19 (talk) 08:03, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and expand. Satisfies GNG. There is plenty of coverage to be found in GBooks and elsewhere. I strongly suspect that there is also a lot of undigitised material in Nigerian libraries. The chances of the piece of legislation establishing the central bank of any large country being non-notable are exactly nil. Please note that this Act is also referred to as the Central Bank of Nigeria Act (which is probably its real name), the Central Bank Act, the Central Bank of Nigeria Ordinance, the CBN Ordinance, and possibly by other expressions (eg citation by year and number). I should also point out that AfD isn't an appropriate venue to propose the merger of an article that is obviously a plausible redirect. I don't think that any valid rationale for deletion has been advanced, since the criticism of this article appears to be that it was short. James500 (talk) 17:38, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:54, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per User:James500. The coverage of countries' legislative structuring should be expanded not removed. AllyD (talk) 06:07, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.