Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaim Tejman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 20:55, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Chaim Tejman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable fringe theory disguised as biography, "sourced" from apparently inaccessible works; the author of the article is apparently its subject. Mangoe (talk) 17:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:OR Drawn Some (talk) 17:46, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, WP:OR, autobiography. Verbal chat 18:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I spent some time looking for any evidence of notability and failed to find any. Dougweller (talk) 18:01, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is pure OR, with no independent sources to establish notability or validity. Looie496 (talk) 18:10, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete OR and no notability that I can find. Dbrodbeck (talk) 19:16, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - WP:N requires that notability be established by citation to reliable sources that are independant of the subject. This article has none (the only citation is a self-published source). While it may seem as if the subject is a scholar, all of the books that the subject has apparently written are self-published. Add to this that the main editor of the article seems to be the subject himself (see article history) and the whole thing smacks of self promotion at best and a hoax at worst. Blueboar (talk) 20:01, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (and maybe SNOW?) No verifiable reliable sources, so no article. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 20:08, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No sources. Fences and windows (talk) 01:43, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.