Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coy Stewart

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 October 29.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:06, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coy Stewart

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP with one source. Zero independent sources. "Best known for" work on a sitcom that hasn't aired yet. One other role, supposedly in post-production. SummerPhD (talk) 13:14, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agree that it's hard to be "best known for" a future show. Maybe this article is valid later, but not yet... — Timneu22 · talk 15:48, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this actor. Joe Chill (talk) 02:40, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:51, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Cute kid, and he may one day have a career and coverage, but as for now... its simply TOOSOON. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:35, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, go ahead and delete. But when the show airs on June 2nd, his guest spot on the Glades airs in July, and the upcoming season of the Electric Company, (which he shoots this summer as a regular cast member) airs in the fall, you'll be right back out here creating his page again. Besides, who are all of you to decide who has a page on here and who doesn't? Are any of YOU "Best known" for anything? Or just a bunch of wanna be's? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chaysecoy (talk • contribs) 06:00, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - We are Wikipedia. We decide what is notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia. It looks like Stewart is not yet notable. - SummerPhD (talk) 10:31, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I'll check back at some point in the future to see if this kid has become "notable" enough in the eyes of the Wiki Gods to be considered worthy of a page.
- We're not trying to be difficult. If the youngster gets the coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO or WP:ENT, the article can be recreated. You might consider asking that it be userfied to you at User:Chaysecoy/Coy Stewart until that time. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:30, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.