Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crisis (novel)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jack Stapleton and Laurie Montgomery series. J04n(talk page) 00:18, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Crisis (novel)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBOOKS. The book has no critical commentary that I could find by a Google and Highbeam search, the book has not won a significant literary award, and I would not consider Robin Cook historically significant, although notable. Albacore (talk) 17:24, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Looks like a copyvio of some blurb, website or advert to me. Not encyclopaedic - would take a complete rewrite. Peridon (talk) 18:27, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Does not look like a copyvio to me. Infact it looks very much like a typical stub. BO | Talk 11:34, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is because you are now seeing User:Tokyogirl79's substantial rewrite after the Copyvio was removed: [1]. AllyD (talk) 13:52, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 12:47, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I forgot to throw my 2 cents in for some reason. My opinion of this is that although the sources on the entry are rather light, this is still technically enough for it to barely squeak by notability guidelines at this point in time. I honestly thing that there would be more merit in creating an entry for the Stapleton series as a whole and redirecting there, but such an entry doesn't yet exist. I'll try and see if I can throw something together, but my schedule has been sort of hectic lately. (I think this is why I didn't immediately vote- I think I was planning on creating such an entry.) It's a weak keep for now, although once an entry for the series is created, it'd be a redirect.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:39, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Jack Stapleton and Laurie Montgomery series. I've started an entry and it needs a LOT of work, but it's a good alternative for the most part. We can redirect and if/when more sources become available, we can unredirect.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:35, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.