Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhimmi Watch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge and redirect, the two articles on Jihad Watch and Dhimmi Watch are both pretty short and are closely related. If the article on Jihad Watch grows to be too large, they can be split again. --- Deville (Talk) 01:14, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dhimmi Watch[edit]

The address for the blog is http://jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/ which is linked from the Jihad Watch. I have also nominated Jihad Watch for deletion here. My reasons: Not notable enough. It is a personal website and blog hosted by Robert Spencer. The blog is only in the top twenty thousand (precisely 20,653) most visited web sites on the internet. We do have personal websites by people who are much more notable and who have less opposing views than Spencer, but there is no wiki-page for their personal bolgs and websites. Reza1 04:24, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and Merge - Dhimmi Watch is on the Jihadwatch site; the Dhimmi Watch talk page contains a number of comments saying that it should be merged with the Jihad Watch article, and I agree. I think it definitely deserves a redirect and merge; googling "Dhimmi Watch" and "Spencer" gets you 190,000 hits.Brianyoumans 06:17, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect these closely related articles. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP. There are thousands of Wiki articles that are less "notable"; and if an editor has discovered that an Alexa ranking is obsolete, he should correct or eliminate the references, not recommend the entire article for deletion.
Furthermore, neither JihadWatch or DhimmiWatch are Spencer's "personal websites" and neither are designed like personal blogs, so the nominator's stated reasons for deletion are all inaccurate.--Mike18xx 18:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, for reasons given at the Jihad Watch AFD. Rogue 9 08:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and Merge - See above --Kitrus 11:35, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and merge - see above Germen (Talk | Contribs ) 14:32, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP It is its own website , regardless of where its hosted and it focuses on a specicic topic of related to Dhimmi.--Amenra 00:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and Merge per above. BhaiSaab ^talk 15:17, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ Redirect and Merge. Forgot to vote. --Reza1 07:51, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and Merge per above. --Aminz 06:40, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to jihadwatch.org --Irishpunktom\^talk 14:30, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - seems to stand alone on its own. InvictaHOG 16:14, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to jihadwatch.org --Truthpedia 23:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.