Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dooby Dooby Moo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While more participation here would have been ideal, consensus in this short discussion is for article retention, albeit weakly due to stated low participation. Additionally, a merge discussion can continue on an article talk page if so desired. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:49, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dooby Dooby Moo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Children's book that fails WP:NBOOK. Long-unreferenced stub. Mikeblas (talk) 11:55, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 01:07, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 22:20, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to authors article Doreen Cronin. Recommend a WP:BLAR, and use the opportunity to ISBNize the other books listed in her article. – S. Rich (talk) 23:33, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Kirkus Review, Humanities 360 review, TTLG review, and a collection of reviews (or something). No problem with notability here. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 08:58, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep [1] (Washington Post, 1 paragraph short review); [2] (Chicago Sun-Times full page review of a play adaptation of the book), plus Kirkus above, seem to just reach notability. Sorry for the paywalls, these may have non-paywalled equivalents. --j⚛e decker ^talk 17:37, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.