Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DreamDoll

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 12:17, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DreamDoll

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable model/musician who fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:ENTERTAINER, and WP:MUSIC. This is an interesting AfD, as the subject is both an entertainer and a musician. DreamDoll fails WP:NMUSIC as her one single and EP both fail to meet any of the criteria set by WP:MUSICBIO. WP:TOOSOON should also be cited, as the subject's music career began in May 2017. The subject also fails WP:ENTERTAINER, as despite the fact she has made two one-season appearances as a supporting cast member on two different shows, this does not fulfill the unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment or the significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions required by WP:ENTERTAINER. Furthermore, in my multiple attempts ([1]) to clean this article I found WP:SIGCOV and WP:VER to both be a constant issue. Some coverage does exist concerning this individual, but none I found went in-depth into the subject, and the vast majority of the information I found was traceable to blogs and other unreliable sources, thus a WP:GNG failure is also likely. In short, the article subject exists but in no way has achieved the notability to be included in an encyclopedia. SamHolt6 (talk) 14:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It should also be noted that Life in Plastic and DreamDoll discography were both recently created by the same editor that created this article, and all three have seen no significant additions by other editors.--SamHolt6 (talk) 14:40, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it is WP:Fancruft or promotional material that fails to meet the standards for Notability. SamHolt6 has done a great job to clean it up and remove the worst offending material. What is left is not notable: supporting roles in two minor reality TV series and one unremarkable EP do not make for a notable contribution.--Gronk Oz (talk) 02:55, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:28, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:33, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not pass notability guidelines for an entertainer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:50, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.