Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily James (Waterloo Road)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural closure only, fate of article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Fisher Jclemens (talk) 02:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Emily James (Waterloo Road)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was redirected to List of Waterloo Road characters, but the redirect was subsequently reverted. I see no sourced information here, beyond what is summarised in List of Waterloo Road characters. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:53, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect: We do not need more wannabe-articles on minor fictional characters. There's several thousand of these dollops of fanwankery that need to be deleted, really. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(^Õل^ō)ˀ Contribs. 02:34, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can I request this is closed as superceded by the nomination I have just created at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Fisher, which covers all the many re-created articles? U-Mos (talk) 09:44, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 09:57, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 10:04, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.